A woman with bunions touches her foot while considering the success rate of bunion surgery

Bunion surgery patient satisfaction rates range from 70.5% to 97% across the methods in published research, and a pooled review of 229 studies found that 10.6% of patients felt dissatisfied after surgery. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) case series report rates between 87% and 97%, while open procedures that realign the bone through a larger incision report rates between 70.5% and 93%.

Our research team reviewed 12 published bunion surgery studies from 2004 through 2025 to compare how patients rate each correction method. The sections below start with overall satisfaction by method, then narrow to the specific results patients ask about most when choosing a surgeon.

Key Takeaways

  • Pooled satisfaction: A review of 229 studies found that 10.6% of patients reported dissatisfaction after bunion surgery, leaving 89.4% satisfied with their result.
  • Highest reported rate: A percutaneous osteotomy study of 156 procedures reported a 97% satisfaction rate at a median follow-up of 22.6 months.
  • MIS vs. open at five years: In a randomized trial, 89% of MIS chevron patients called themselves very satisfied at five years, compared with 70% of open chevron patients.
  • Lapidus fusion: Lapidus fusion results vary more than any other method, with satisfaction ranging from 70.5% in a 78-patient survey to 93% in a 213-procedure review.

Patient Satisfaction Rate by Bunion Surgery Method, 2026

Satisfaction rates in the published research differ by 26.5 percentage points between the highest and lowest studies we reviewed. Each study measures satisfaction through its own patient survey, so the rates show broad patterns across methods. The table below lists each study’s satisfaction rate next to its sample size, and the third column shows how long each study followed its patients.

Surgical MethodPatients or Feet StudiedAverage Follow-UpSatisfaction Rate
All methods (pooled review)229 studiesVaries by study89.4%1
Percutaneous distal osteotomy (MIS)156 procedures22.6 months (median)97%2
Minimally invasive chevron and Akin (MICA)274 feet12.9 months91.6%2
Minimally invasive chevron and Akin (MICA)78 feet25 months87%2
Open modified chevron osteotomy (includes 48 big toe arthritis cases)232 feet41.7 months93%4
Lapidus fusion213 procedures5.4 years93%5
Open scarf osteotomy123 feet4.8 years84.6%6
Lapidus fusion78 patients17 months70.5%7

Key Insights:

  • MIS case series in the table report satisfaction between 87% and 97%, though each one followed patients for about two years or less.
  • Open procedures with nearly five years of follow-up or longer still earn satisfaction rates of 84.6% or higher.

Minimally Invasive vs. Open Bunion Surgery Satisfaction Rates, 2026

Head-to-head studies give patients the most direct comparison because both groups answer the same survey at the same time points. Our analysis below tracks how satisfaction shifted over time across two head-to-head studies.

Study DesignProcedures ComparedTime PointMIS GroupOpen Group
Randomized trial (47 patients)MIS chevron vs. open chevron9 months87.5% satisfied385% satisfied3
Randomized trial (47 patients)MIS chevron vs. open chevron5 years89% very satisfied370% very satisfied3
Matched cohort (60 patients)MICA vs. open scarf and Akin6 months87% satisfied373% satisfied3
Matched cohort (60 patients)MICA vs. open scarf and Akin24 months80% satisfied387% satisfied3

Key Insights:

  • The MIS chevron group’s very satisfied share climbed from 62.5% at nine months to 89% at five years, while the open group stayed at 70%.
  • The matched cohort favored MICA at six months, but the open scarf group overtook it by 24 months with 87% satisfaction.

Top Satisfaction Ratings by Bunion Surgery Method, 2026

Overall satisfaction can hide how strongly patients feel about their results, so several studies split answers into rating levels. Each survey labels its top tier differently, so the second column shows the exact term patients chose. The table below shows the share of patients who picked the highest rating each study offered.

Surgical MethodTop Rating OfferedShare Choosing Top RatingFollow-Up
MIS chevron (randomized trial)Very satisfied89%35 years
Percutaneous chevron and Akin (PECA)Highly satisfied76.8%23.1 years
Third-generation MICAExcellent70%212 months
Open modified chevron osteotomyVery satisfied70%441.7 months
Open chevron (randomized trial)Very satisfied70%35 years

Key Insights:

  • The MIS chevron group posted the highest top-rating share at 89%, which beats every open procedure in the table by 19 percentage points.
  • Three of the five groups placed exactly 70% of patients in the top tier, and the remaining 30% of third-generation MICA patients reported a good outcome.

Bunion Surgery Dissatisfaction Rates by Method, 2026

Dissatisfaction rates tell patients how often surgery falls short of their expectations, and the studies we reviewed place that figure between 1% and 15%. In our analysis below, each row lists the share of patients who reported dissatisfaction after surgery.

Surgical MethodPatients or Feet StudiedFollow-UpDissatisfied
Open chevron (randomized trial)22 patients9 months15%3
All methods (pooled review)229 studiesVaries by study10.6%1
MIS chevron (randomized trial)25 patients9 months8.3%3
Lapidus fusion78 patients17 months7%7
Open modified chevron osteotomy232 feet41.7 months1%4

Key Insights:

  • At nine months, the open chevron group reported nearly double the dissatisfaction rate of the MIS chevron group in the same randomized trial.
  • In the Lapidus survey, 80.2% of patients said they would choose the same method again, even though only 70.5% described themselves as satisfied.

Further Reading

Request a Copy of This Report

Request a PDF copy of this report to review these satisfaction rates at home.

Request a PDF copy of this report to review these satisfaction rates at home.

Request a PDF report now

Sources

  1. Barg A, et al. Unfavorable Outcomes Following Surgical Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2018
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgical Techniques for Correcting Hallux Valgus: Other Relevant Studies, 2023
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgical Techniques for Correcting Hallux Valgus: Evidence Summary, 2023
  4. Vasso M, et al. A Modified Austin/Chevron Osteotomy for Treatment of Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2016
  5. Asafo AF, et al. Patient-Reported and Radiologic Outcomes With the Lapidus Procedure. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 2022
  6. Freslon M, et al. Scarf Osteotomy for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus: A Review of 123 Cases With 4.8 Years Follow-Up. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique, 2005
  7. Rink-Brüne O. Lapidus Arthrodesis for Management of Hallux Valgus: A Retrospective Review of 106 Cases. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2004
Rye Brook NYC Appointments

Accessibility Tools

Increase TextIncrease Text
Decrease TextDecrease Text
GrayscaleGrayscale
Invert Colors
Readable FontReadable Font
Reset